What I believe
David Brooks of the New York Times, wrote this in his column today, which explained why Catholic “quasi-believers” are so successful in our society:
For there are at least two things we know about flourishing in a modern society.
First, college students who attend religious services regularly do better than those that don’t. As Margarita Mooney, a Princeton sociologist, has demonstrated in her research, they work harder and are more engaged with campus life. Second, students who come from denominations that encourage dissent are more successful, on average, than students from denominations that don’t.
This embodies the social gospel annex to the quasi-religious creed: Always try to be the least believing member of one of the more observant sects. Participate in organized religion, but be a friendly dissident inside. Ensconce yourself in traditional moral practice, but champion piecemeal modernization. Submit to the wisdom of the ages, but with one eye open.
One eye open. It’s an interesting notion, and it may well be that this recipe predicts success in our society right now. But it only rings true for me if by “one eye open,” you mean that you are looking to supplement the wisdom that one tradition teaches you with additional wisdom.
I prefer belief to skepticism. My belief in a powerful God has often been the only reassurance that got me up and out of bed in the morning. Buddha sat under the Bodhi tree and waited for enlightenment. He wasn’t evaluating options; he was looking for an answer to explain human suffering. As far as suffering goes, I believe that God doesn’t bring it to us.
I don’t have all the answers, but I don’t feel the need to keep one eye on the possibility that God has suffering in the works for us. It’s a better world if he doesn’t.




